Morning Must Reads: The Tax Foundation Has It Both Ways

Paul Krugman catches the Tax Foundation making a bizarre claim about income inequality and in the process reminds us all about the organization's poor track record on the facts.

The thing is, I’m quite sure that this is a deliberate attempt to obfuscate. The Tax Foundation people have to have known what they were doing.

Actually, there’s one place where you can easily catch them red-handed. When they want to claim that those poor rich people are bearing too high a tax burden compared with the lucky duckies, they pretend that federal income taxes are the only taxes. But when they calculate Tax Freedom Day, which is supposed to show how terribly overtaxed we all are, somehow all those taxes that don’t make it into the distribution calculation are front and center.

This morning, the Editorial Board of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette does an excellent job reminding us all about the value of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

What's in your wallet? Maybe a little more green, now that Capital One must reimburse 2 million customers for over-aggressive selling.

The big bank was fined $210 million last week by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau for selling customers credit card products they could not use or did not want.

The penalty was the first action by the new regulatory agency created by the Dodd-Frank law, Congress's response to the financial crisis of 2008. The bureau, which was fought by Republican lawmakers, is charged with protecting customers from high-pressure, deceptive or aggressive tactics by banks and other financial firms.

The agency said Capital One's call centers misled customers on payment-protection insurance, an option to help card holders pay their credit bills in the event of job loss, death or disability. Regulators said the marketers deceived customers into thinking that the protection was free, mandatory and would improve credit scores; the bureau's 30-page order alleged that call centers sold the provision to ineligible out-of-work customers and forced it on them without consent...

This is just the kind of role the bureau was expected to play, and its successful action shows how wrong-headed the political opposition to the agency's creation was.

Comments

0 comments posted

Post new comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the Keystone Research Center or Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center and do not constitute official endorsement by either organization. Please note that comments will be approved during the Keystone Research Center's business hours.

If you have questions, please contact Lilienthal@pennbpc.org.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.