So Far, So Good, But Keep Your Eyes on Corporate, Sales Tax Collections

Four months into the 2012-13 fiscal year, Pennsylvania’s General Fund tax collections are more than $400 million ahead of receipts at this point last year and outpacing Corbett administration year-to-date estimates.

Tax collections rebounded in September and October after missing the mark in the first two months of the fiscal year. To date, tax collections are $65 million, or 0.8%, higher than estimate, and $435 million, or 5.7%, ahead of tax collections this time last year. Both are good signs that the state’s revenues are on track, so far.

What follows is a quick summary of the latest revenue report. For more numbers and details, read my longer analysis at the Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center's web site.

Corporate taxes made up much of the surplus in both September and October. Personal income and realty transfer taxes have also been coming in higher than monthly revenue targets. Most revenue sources are ahead of last year, signaling a continued – if stubborn – economic recovery.

Corporate tax collections look healthy now but are notoriously volatile. Roughly 75% of corporate collections will be collected in the second half of the fiscal year. This will be one area to watch.

Meanwhile, sales tax, the General Fund’s second largest revenue source, fell short of estimate in September and October. In the first quarter (July-September), overall revenue collections came up $120 million short of the Independent Fiscal Office’s (IFO) quarterly revenue estimate, largely because of lackluster sales tax collections.

Taken in total, Pennsylvania’s revenue collections are stronger than expected one-third the way through the fiscal year and certainly stronger than at this point last year. Both are positive signs as we progress through this fiscal year and as Corbett administration officials begin to develop spending plans for 2013-14.

Comments

1 comments posted

Speaking of revenue, what

Speaking of revenue, what possible justification does the Administration have for forgiving all licensing fees for doctors and other professionals?  At 18 million dollars for two years, this is a high price tag item that would replace several of the more painful social service and Medicaid cuts that the Administration has justified as tough decisions in tough budgetary times.  If things are so tough why are we giving away money to doctors?  Does anyone think that giving a prosperous doctor $300 makes any difference at all.

Post new comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the Keystone Research Center or Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center and do not constitute official endorsement by either organization. Please note that comments will be approved during the Keystone Research Center's business hours.

If you have questions, please contact Lilienthal@pennbpc.org.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.