How Does Job Growth in Pennsylvania Measure Up?

In this year's State of Working Pennsylvania, we decided to look once again at the pace of job growth in Pennsylvania relative to the other 49 states. What's different about our analysis this time is that we compare Pennsylvania's job performance at comparable points in the economic recovery that followed each of the last three recessions.

Employment Growth at Same Point in Economic Recovery That Followed Last Three RecessionsFrom January 2011 to July 2013, Pennsylvania ranked 46th out of the 50 states in terms of the percent increase in employment (looking at just private-sector job growth, the state ranked 45th).

Job growth during the January 2011 to July 2013 period has been slower — and the state’s job growth ranking among the 50 states slightly lower — than in either of the two periods following the 1990 and 2001 recessions.

It is true that Pennsylvania’s job-growth ranking in the last 32 months is only slightly lower than its job-growth rankings in comparable periods of the recoveries following the last two recessions. Still, it is important to note that the current rankings represent a sharp decline from Pennsylvania's 2010 ranking of 7th and 12th, respectively, for total nonfarm and total private-sector job growth.

Far too many people want to avoid talking about that first full year of the recovery in Pennsylvania. One very important reason that job growth in 2010 was stronger than any of the years since is the public policy that was in effect that year. State and federal spending was still supporting the economy through greater investments in education, infrastructure, and health care, and extended unemployment insurance.

In the years since 2010, public policy has reversed course as both federal and Pennsylvania policymakers have taken steps that have weakened job growth and slowed the pace of the decline in unemployment. In fact, as we note in the State of Working Pennsylvania, the unemployment rate in Pennsylvania fell six-tenths of one percentage point between January 2010 and January 2011 (from 8.6% to 8%), but it has taken another two-and-a-half years for the rate to fall another half a percentage point, to 7.5%.

Policymakers chose a path that kept unemployment higher than it would otherwise be, which in turn has depressed the growth in wages and fueled the shocking rise in inequality we have witnessed since 2009. See The Wall Street Journal today for a summary of the latest trends in top incomes.

Comments

0 comments posted

Post new comment

Comment Policy:

Thank you for joining the conversation. Comments are limited to 1,500 characters and are subject to approval and moderation. We reserve the right to remove comments that:

  • are injurious, defamatory, profane, off-topic or inappropriate;
  • contain personal attacks or racist, sexist, homophobic, or other slurs;
  • solicit and/or advertise for personal blogs and websites or to sell products or services;
  • may infringe the copyright or intellectual property rights of others or other applicable laws or regulations; or
  • are otherwise inconsistent with the goals of this blog.

Posted comments do not necessarily represent the views of the Keystone Research Center or Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center and do not constitute official endorsement by either organization. Please note that comments will be approved during the Keystone Research Center's business hours.

If you have questions, please contact Lyon@pennbpc.org.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <img>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Refresh Type the characters you see in this picture. Type the characters you see in the picture; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.  Switch to audio verification.